From 7da05eff467244f0da6a4e7c1370dd6c7605e9f4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniel Nicolai <dalanicolai@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 12:16:31 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 102/127] fix issue #457

I found out I did not set a value for invert when adding the rich rule via firewall-cmd. Then I got the error as mentioned in issue #457 because the invert attribute was given a default value None. I corrected it here so that it gets the default value False. This fixed the issue for me.
---
 src/firewall/core/rich.py | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/src/firewall/core/rich.py b/src/firewall/core/rich.py
index 91f53fd9..dacaeb9c 100644
--- a/src/firewall/core/rich.py
+++ b/src/firewall/core/rich.py
@@ -394,7 +394,7 @@ class Rich_Rule(object):
                 elif element in ['not', 'NOT']:
                     attrs['invert'] = True
                 else:
-                    self.source = Rich_Source(attrs.get('address'), attrs.get('mac'), attrs.get('ipset'), attrs.get('invert'))
+                    self.source = Rich_Source(attrs.get('address'), attrs.get('mac'), attrs.get('ipset'), attrs.get('invert', False))
                     in_elements.pop() # source
                     attrs.clear()
                     index = index -1 # return token to input
-- 
2.19.1

